does the ps3 suck? Gabe Newell thinks so.

[dcku]

Originally Posted by devilnash

urm i think ur chattting bare sh*T , why does everyone think the ps3 cost mega bucks? if u get your head out your ass u will see that the ps3 cost more to make then they are selling it for and also your not just getting a games console but a blu ray player which at the moment in the uk is going for around £2000 pounds alone... thats $4000 dollers... so you getting a games console which insain graphics and a blu ray drive for wat $450......sooo whats the problem ?

the wii is sh*t. yes its cheap and its easyer to make profit that way but the wii isnt targeted to vs ps3 and 360 . wii is like a big family or a big group of peeps wanting to play something together.

you cant compare wii to ps3 cos there on differant levels...

but u can compare ps3 and x box 360 and all i have to say about that is

360 graphics aint gonna improve much where as ps3 graphics at the moment are only using about 30% ps3 powerr...... now come on ps3 graphics at 30% ps3 power are still better den most 360 games....


so in other words the PS3 does not suck..... the 360 sucks and well the wii is ok i guess....

The 360 doesn't suck ok. It's PS3 that suck big time. There is still plenty of potential to be reached for the 360. Because it came out a year earlier than the PS3, 360 developers will always be a year ahead when it comes to game development so therefore the graphics for the games will always look better on the 360 than the PS3.

[bkbroiler]

the ps3 does not even come close to being as fun as the 360 or wii

[dcku]

Originally Posted by bkbroiler

the ps3 does not even come close to being as fun as the 360 or wii

Totally agree! PS3 is just a cheap blueray player with a few good games, that's all.

[A_RaNdOm_TaCo]

Originally Posted by devilnash

urm i think ur chattting bare sh*T , why does everyone think the ps3 cost mega bucks? if u get your head out your ass u will see that the ps3 cost more to make then they are selling it for and also your not just getting a games console but a blu ray player which at the moment in the uk is going for around £2000 pounds alone... thats $4000 dollers... so you getting a games console which insain graphics and a blu ray drive for wat $450......sooo whats the problem ?

the wii is sh*t. yes its cheap and its easyer to make profit that way but the wii isnt targeted to vs ps3 and 360 . wii is like a big family or a big group of peeps wanting to play something together.

you cant compare wii to ps3 cos there on differant levels...

but u can compare ps3 and x box 360 and all i have to say about that is

360 graphics aint gonna improve much where as ps3 graphics at the moment are only using about 30% ps3 powerr...... now come on ps3 graphics at 30% ps3 power are still better den most 360 games....


so in other words the PS3 does not suck..... the 360 sucks and well the wii is ok i guess....

since when did blu ray players cost 4000???

how do you know its using 30%, oh.... waiiiiiiiiit, you dont!

Ps3s cost 600 here, maybe you mean 450 euros?

[cptmanok]

Originally Posted by devilnash

urm i think ur chattting bare sh*T , why does everyone think the ps3 cost mega bucks? if u get your head out your ass u will see that the ps3 cost more to make then they are selling it for and also your not just getting a games console but a blu ray player which at the moment in the uk is going for around £2000 pounds alone... thats $4000 dollers... so you getting a games console which insain graphics and a blu ray drive for wat $450......sooo whats the problem ?

the wii is sh*t. yes its cheap and its easyer to make profit that way but the wii isnt targeted to vs ps3 and 360 . wii is like a big family or a big group of peeps wanting to play something together.

you cant compare wii to ps3 cos there on differant levels...

but u can compare ps3 and x box 360 and all i have to say about that is

360 graphics aint gonna improve much where as ps3 graphics at the moment are only using about 30% ps3 powerr...... now come on ps3 graphics at 30% ps3 power are still better den most 360 games....


so in other words the PS3 does not suck..... the 360 sucks and well the wii is ok i guess....

You reeaally dont understand what im saying! newell is saying the ps3 is a failure because sony isnt gaining profit from it, like nintendo is from the wii!

[Master Victor]

Originally Posted by bkbroiler

the ps3 does not even come close to being as fun as the 360 or wii

ok how do you know that the Wii and 360 are more fun that the PS3 ? do you have all 3 ? have you even play all the games that have been made for ps, ps2, and PS3 to know that the 360 and Wii are more fun., if not then stop flaming and bashing since it doesn't help anyone

Originally Posted by dcku

Totally agree! PS3 is just a cheap blueray player with a few good games, that's all.

Now we all know that you will agree to anything that don't say 360 SUCKS. If the PS3 sucks so does the 360 ,the Wii and all games ever made. Now everyone's happy

[jehutyb]

No matter how you look at it there will be people who think all three systems suck, and no matter how you look at it it is one persons opinion, nothing more and nothing less. Gabe Newell i would seriously hope was slightly more biasis towards Microsoft thats were he worked for a good 13 years. And now being one of the cofounders of valve one would wonder why the new expansion is coming out on the PS3....

Originally Posted by dcku

The 360 doesn't suck ok. It's PS3 that suck big time. There is still plenty of potential to be reached for the 360. Because it came out a year earlier than the PS3, 360 developers will always be a year ahead when it comes to game development so therefore the graphics for the games will always look better on the 360 than the PS3.

I'm sorry but how can you say "Graphics for the games will always look better on the 360 than on the ps3" i mean that has already been proven wrong.... As shown by EA and their mass numbers of ports... Need For Speed and Fight Night have both been rated better graphically on the PS3 over the 360.... And the 360 should have seriously had the advangate both in terms of amount of time available to develop and its "graphical superiority."

[devilnash]

jehutyb is right.

360 grahpics will not increase as much but i can see for you 360 fan boys its just toooooooooo much to take in cos the 360 been out a year ahead of the ps3 and well the ps3 launch games are at the same graphics as the 360 games out now ( not incuding gears of war)

another thing gears of war is the only game on 360 dat has insain grahpics but thats the highest you can go on a 360 were as ps3 will have gears of war graphics by hmmmm 2-3 months from now i saw.....

also if you would hav read properly i wrote a BLU RAY PLAYER COSTS £2000 WHICH IS $4000. and well you getting a blu ray player in the ps3 anyways so the ps3 works out farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr more cheaper.

also blu ray rules compared to u hd dvd.... how stupid is microsoft ? they got a hd dvd which they could have made games on to improve game play and graphics and all dat crap but hey they chose to use it for movies.....LOLLLLZZZZ......i no u 360 boys dnt wanna look stupid thats why u backing that box so much but open ur eyes and see the ps3 is a million times better!!!!

alsooo for the 360 fool that questioned me bout the 30% ps3 power, well EA had offically said that all there games are using only 30% ps3 power and well come on look at our games they better then urs.... alsooo the guy in sony that was with kaz at the ps3 launch, he also said the ps3 games are only using 30% ps3 powerr......................... SHAME ON U 360 BOYS........

so the result is the 360 is a waste of money. you might as well buy a ps3 or a wii....
360 sucks bigtime.....

p.s iv played all 3 systems and well i own a ps3. 360 was ... wii wasent really my type of thing and well the ps3 is gods gift to all of us loll

[dcku]

Originally Posted by jehutyb

No matter how you look at it there will be people who think all three systems suck, and no matter how you look at it it is one persons opinion, nothing more and nothing less. Gabe Newell i would seriously hope was slightly more biasis towards Microsoft thats were he worked for a good 13 years. And now being one of the cofounders of valve one would wonder why the new expansion is coming out on the PS3....



I'm sorry but how can you say "Graphics for the games will always look better on the 360 than on the ps3" i mean that has already been proven wrong.... As shown by EA and their mass numbers of ports... Need For Speed and Fight Night have both been rated better graphically on the PS3 over the 360.... And the 360 should have seriously had the advangate both in terms of amount of time available to develop and its "graphical superiority."

How do you know Gabe Newell worked 13 years for Microsoft and then jumped to working for Valve? I mean, you could have just made that up yourself.

Fight Night Round 3 does not look better on the PS3. Check out the link yourself.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

With many eye witnesses at the Apollo saying the XBOX 360 version looked better, what more proof do you need.

Also, Need for Speed - Carbon looks a lot more detailed on XBOX 360 than PS3. See the link below.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Look closely to the rear mirror on the PS3 version. It looks much less detailed compaired to the XBOX 360 one.

PS3 will never have graphical advantage to XBOX 360 and that's the truth you just have to accept!

And devilnash, stop your fan boy talk please.

[phenomenon9999]

I dont think it would make a major difference that Gabe Whatever said what he said. To the general public who want to buy a console, the total majority wouldn't even know about this. Consumers are ignorant and always miss informed. They dont care either. If the final product looks good on screen and plays fine, then they are generally satisfied. I don't think everyone is going to know about all theses minor details that people put out. Generally, people don't spend vast amount of time snooping around forums alot to read negatives and positives only, let alone this one.
Most don't go around saying: "Oh, the detail of the game looks better on so and so". There generally isn't always direct comparisons all the time on massive screens that no one can afford to tell people what to buy. And they woudn't know about all theses link telling them that.